In this episode, we talk to William Brice, fresh out of his Master’s program at Purdue, about his research on stigma and disabilities. The study is fascinating, especially how Will set it up to experimentally manipulate disability conditions. If you’d like to learn more, please contact Will on his LinkedIn account or send him an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Don’t cry, kids, but this will be the last episode in the old “single voice” format. You’re just going to have to get used to hearing the actual guests speaking for themselves from now on.
In this episode, Andrew Naber, PhD, (@) discusses retesting. How does retesting affect scores and how should we interpret test score increases? Should we offer retesting to job applicants? Should we request retesting if we’re the job applicant?
On this episode, Marc Prine, PhD, a Director of Talent Consulting and Assessment at Taylor Strategy Partners, joins me to talk about strategic job analysis. What is it, and what makes it different from traditional job analysis? Why should HR professionals get into it? How do companies use this technique? And, most importantly, what’s the best ballpark in the U.S.?
In this episode, Paul Thoresen (@surveyguy2) joins us to talk about change management. Thanks to Chris Giebe (@chrisgiebe), Christopher Hudson(@chrishudsonjr), and Veronika Jakl (@VeronikaJakl) for their great questions.
- What’s the Evidence for Change Management? (HR Magazine)
- Effects of Change Interventions: What Kind of Evidence Do We Really Have? (Journal of Applied Behavioral Science)
Steven Tseng (@stwtseng), an IO Psych grad student at the University of Akron talks about what got him interested in IO, the appeal of IO compared to an MBA or HRM degree, what makes a good IO professor (and department), and, of course, hitting people in the head with sticks.
Thanks to Timothy Jesurun, Peter J. Reily, Eugene Ohu, and John Heffernon for their questions.
Be sure to listen for this episodes question and respond on twitter @.
In this episode Dave Bracken gets a chance to respond to my various belly-aches about his excellent contribution on 360s in Episode 6. (If you haven’t already listened to that one, you’ll want to do that.) Dave also responds to a question from Paul Thoreson.